Twitter Suspends India’s Minister of Communications After Sony DMCA Notice

[Anna Kushina (櫛名アンナ)]

Ravi Shankar Prasad, India's Minister for Communications, Electronics & Information Technology and Law & Justice, has fired off a broadside against Twitter after it suspended his account for alleged copyright infringement. After first accusing Twitter of stifling free speech, it now appears that Sony filed a DMCA notice that targeted a 2017 tweet linking to unlicensed music.

Twitter PiratePeople who post content created by other people to platforms like Twitter run the risk being accused of copyright infringement. In response, Twitter can choose to suspend or even ban accounts entirely.

These events are relatively common and attract very little attention, unless the account in question is operated by someone famous or who is otherwise important.

Twitter Suspends Indian Government Minister

On Friday, Ravi Shankar Prasad, India’s Minister for Communications, Electronics & Information Technology and Law & Justice, had his account suspended by Twitter. The clearly infuriated Minister later took to Twitter itself to voice his displeasure, with a brief but inconclusive explanation for the action.

“Friends! Something highly peculiar happened today,” Prasad wrote. “Twitter denied access to my account for almost an hour on the alleged ground that there was a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of the USA and subsequently they allowed me to access the account.”

Prasad accompanied his tweet with a copy of the notice he received from Twitter. It indicated there had been a DMCA complaint and if he wanted his account to be unblocked, he effectively needed to educate himself on copyright law – quite something for a fully qualified lawyer heading up India’s Law and Justice Ministry.

Prasad Twitter

It appears that Prasad completed the required viewing of Twitter’s Copyright Policy and an hour later his account was unlocked. However, the Minister was not happy.

Broadside Against Twitter

In a series of tweets, the Indian politician attacked Twitter for suspending his account, accusing the company of breaching local law and being duplicitous when it comes to free speech.

While Prasad has made his thoughts crystal clear, perhaps the more pressing question is why Twitter took action against his account in the first place.

Twitter Received a Complaint From IFPI / Sony

Despite Prasad posting a series of tweets complaining about Twitter’s actions, the Minister didn’t explain why he received a copyright complaint against his account or indeed who sent it. However, since Twitter submits copies of DMCA notices received to the Lumen Database, it isn’t difficult to find that information.

On May 24, 2021, a month before Twitter suspended Prasad’s account, the platform received a DMCA notice from the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), stating that one of the Minister’s tweets beached copyright law.

Sent on behalf of Sony, the DMCA notice claimed infringement of the track ‘Maa Tujhe Salaam’ by AR Rahman. The offending URL now displays a notice from Twitter stating that it has been withheld due to a complaint. The original tweet dates back to 2017.

Another Indian MP Also Suspended

In response to Prasad’s complaints about the suspension, another Indian MP chimed in to say he too had been targeted by a takedown notice.

“Raviji, the same thing just happened to me. Clearly DMCA is getting hyperactive. This tweet has been deleted by @Twitter because its video includes the copyrighted BoneyM song ‘Rasputin’,” Shashi Tharoor wrote.

According to Lumen, Tharoor now has at least six DMCA complaints against his account, all targeting the same tweet, which appears to have featured medical students dancing to the Boney M track. Who sent the notices isn’t detailed in the complaints featured on Lumen but a response tweet featuring exactly the same song appears to have slipped through the net.

While press reports in India suggest that Twitter might be firing back at the government following a spat over new legal rules (which ironically center around the requirement to remove objectionable content more quickly), this looks like a normal day at the office for the DMCA.

 

 

Content source: TorrentFreak.