Invite Scene - #1 to Buy, Sell, Trade or Find Free Torrent Invites
#1 TorrentInvites Community. Buy, Sell, Trade or Find Free Torrent Invites for Every Private Torrent Trackers. HDB, BTN, AOM, DB9, PTP, RED, MTV, EXIGO, FL, IPT, TVBZ, AB, BIB, TIK, EMP, FSC, GGN, KG, MTTP, TL, TTG, 32P, AHD, CHD, CG, OPS, TT, WIHD, BHD, U2 etc.
LOOKING FOR HIGH QUALITY SEEDBOX? EVOSEEDBOX.COM PROVIDES YOU BLAZING FAST & HIGH END SEEDBOXES | STARTING AT $5.00/MONTH!
EARN UP TO 2.00 USD PER PRIVATE TORRENT TRACKER REVIEW ON SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION. TIME’S RUNNING OUT!
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'response'.
Found 3 results
Apps such as Popcorn Time and Android devices pre-configured for piracy allow complete novices to pirate movies, TV shows and live sports with ease. This hasn't gone unnoticed by anti-piracy outfits included FACT and BREIN, who inform TorrentFreak they plan to tackle the threat. After one and a half decades of mainstream file-sharing, millions of people now have little trouble finding and consuming unauthorized content online. For many the process is no more difficult than browsing the web but due to its technical nature the majority still find it bewildering. Then along came Popcorn Time, software that turned viewing movies into childâ€™s play for anyone with a PC, tablet or phone. But the idea behind Popcorn Time isnâ€™t new. Advanced users of the popular Kodi software (previously known as XBMC) have been enjoying a super-charged Popcorn Time rival for many years. However, that largely requires the mastering of an often confusing third-party addon system. Inevitably, of course, that became streamlined too. Just as Popcorn Time works out of the box, custom installations of Kodi do too. These installers make the previously complex setup process a breeze and in doing so introduce a whole new audience of novices to piracy, just like Popcorn Time has. Of course, this simplicity hasnâ€™t gone unnoticed by anti-piracy outfits. Legal action against Popcorn Time was common in 2014 and continued in 2015. No surprise then that those peddling â€˜pirateâ€™ Kodi variants (which have nothing to do with the team behind the project) are now getting more attention. The problem is availability and ease of use. Sold pre-configured in Android set-top box form on both eBay and Amazon, the devices are essentially a one-stop shop for not only pirate movies and TV shows, but also a streaming hub for live sports and PPV. Anyone can have one of these devices delivered next day and learn how to use it in under an hour. Oh, and they run Popcorn Time too. And Showbox. As a result, piracy has never been easier and anti-piracy groups are scrambling to stem the tide. Just last week a seller of â€˜pirateâ€™ Android boxes was raided by police in the UK and just days ago Amazon overreacted by banning the entirely legal Kodi software itself, presumably after a copyright holder complaint. Other attacks have been more targeted. Last year the Federation Against Copyright Theft filed a complaint against a popular live sports plugin for Kodi known as Sports Devil. But according to FACT, this was just the beginning of their crackdown on these piracy platforms. â€œThose engaged in piracy have always been quick to take advantage of technological advances to create new methods to profit from delivering stolen content to a wider audience. The proliferation of IPTV and set-top boxes which can stream content is no exception,â€ the anti-piracy group told TF. â€œWe are working with our members and partners in law enforcement on addressing these threats and significant measures are being taken by all parties, including online market places, to address the availability of these devices, as well as the apps and add ons that facilitate illegal streams, and bring those responsible to account.â€ The â€˜custom Kodiâ€™ epidemic hasnâ€™t gone unnoticed in the Netherlands either. Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN is currently engaged in legal action against Filmspeler.nl, a seller of â€œfully loadedâ€ (a euphemism for â€œpiracy configuredâ€) Android boxes. In fact, BREIN is so serious about ending the problem that the case is being sent to the European Court of Justice so that an opinion can be gained on whether streaming from illegal sources represents a breach of EU law. If BREIN wins it wonâ€™t end the problem, but it will draw a line in the sand in terms of how such products can be advertised and sold. â€œWe will always look at any system that is aimed at providing access to copyrighted content without consent of the right holders and by doing so is causing damage to the earning potential of right holders and licensed platforms,â€ BREIN chief Tim Kuik told TorrentFreak. Finally, since these devices are increasingly being targeted at the non-tech savvy, is it possible that buyers are naive to the point that they donâ€™t appreciate their dubious legal standing? Kuik thinks not. â€œWe see that people using such systems tend to be aware they are getting access to unauthorized content even if they donâ€™t know how it works technically,â€ the BREIN chief concludes. The big question now is what comes next, and what will be the industryâ€™s response? That will become clear in the months and years to come but rest assured, the easier piracy becomes, the more vigorous the response will be. https://torrentfreak.com/when-piracy-gets-too-easy-expect-a-big-response-150620/
Two weeks ago PayPal closed the account of cloud-storage service Mega, citing pressure from Visa and MasterCard. The ban has undoubtedly hurt Mega's business, and CEO Graham Gaylard is in Europe to discuss possible legal repercussions against a report that's partly responsible for the ban September last year the Digital Citizens Alliance and NetNames released a report that looked into the business models of â€œshadowyâ€ file-storage sites. Titled â€œBehind The Cyberlocker Door: A Report How Shadowy Cyberlockers Use Credit Card Companies to Make Millions,â€ the report offers insight into the money streams that end up at these alleged pirate sites. The research claims that the sites in question are mostly used for copyright infringement. But while there are indeed many shadowy hosting services, many were surprised to see the Kim Dotcom-founded Mega.co.nz on there. For entertainment industry groups the report offered an opportunity to put pressure on Visa and MasterCard. In doing so they received support from U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy, who was also the lead sponsor of the defunct controversial Protect IP Act (PIPA). Senator Leahy wrote a letter to the credit card companies claiming that the sites mentioned in the report have â€œno legitimate purpose or activity,â€ hoping they would cut their connections to the mentioned sites. Visa and MasterCard took these concerns to heart and pressed PayPal to cut off its services to Mega, which eventually happened late last month. Interestingly, PayPal cited Megaâ€™s end-to-end-encryption as one of the key problems, as that would make it harder to see what files users store. The PayPal ban has been a huge blow for Mega, both reputation-wise and financially. And the realization that the controversial NetNames report is one of the main facilitators of the problems is all the more frustrating. TorrentFreak spoke with CEO Graham Gaylard, who previously characterized the report as â€œgrossly untrue and highly defamatory,â€ to discuss whether Mega still intends to take steps against the UK-based NetNames for their accusations. Initially, taking legal action against NetNames for defamation was difficult, as UK law requires the complaining party to show economic damage. However, after the PayPal ban this shouldnâ€™t be hard to do. Gaylard is traveling through Europe at the moment and he notes that possible repercussions against the damaging report are high on the agenda. â€œYes, I am here to see Megaâ€™s London-based legal counsel to discuss the next steps in progressing the NetNamesâ€™ response,â€ Gaylard informs TF. Megaâ€™s CEO couldnâ€™t release any details on a possible defamation lawsuit, but he stressed that his company will fiercely defend itself against smear campaigns. â€œMega has been operating, and continues to operate a completely legitimate and transparent business. Unfortunately now, with the blatant, obvious, political pressure and industry lobbying against Mega, Mega needs to defend itself and will now cease taking a passive stance,â€ Gaylard says. According to the CEO Mega is running a perfectly legal business. The allegation that itâ€™s a piracy haven is completely fabricated. Like any other storage provider, there is copyrighted content on Megaâ€™s servers, but thatâ€™s a tiny fraction of the total stored. To illustrate this, Gaylard mentions that they only receive a few hundred takedown notices per month. In addition, he notes more than 99.7% of the 18 million files that are uploaded per day are smaller than 20MB in size, not enough to share a movie or TV-show. These statistics are certainly not the hallmark of a service with â€œno legitimate purpose or activity,â€ as was claimed. While the PayPal ban is a major setback, Mega is still doing well in terms of growth. They have 15 million registered customers across 200 countries, and hundreds of thousands of new users join every month. https://torrentfreak.com/mega-ponders-legal-action-in-response-to-damaging-paypal-ban-150312/
"There is no place in the video game community--or our society--for personal attacks and threats.â€ The Entertainment Software Association manages the E3 event The Entertainment Software Association, the games industry trade group that manages the annual E3 event, has called for an end to online harassment amid a bitter row between gamers on social media. In recent weeks, a diverse range of people have been using a hashtag on Twitter as a platform to air their criticisms of the games media. Some have used this "Gamergate" tag to allege that media outlets are too close to the companies they cover, while others have used it to scrutinse the media's stance on issues of sexism and diversity. However, the "Gamergate" row on social media has coincided with the targeted harassment of female games developers and critics, and supporters of them, leading some to believe that the hashtag is both an incentive and catalyst for online abuse. The feminist games essayist Anita Sarkeesian, for example, on Tuesday decided to cancel a university speech after an anonymous phone call threatened a "massacre" if her talk went ahead. Sarkeesian, who regularly publishes images of threats of sexual violence she receives, recently abandoned her home after one harasser appeared to have found her address. Meanwhile, a recent awards show that honoured Sarkeesian's work was issued with a bomb threat, warning of casualties if Sarkeesian picked up the prize. Now the US's key games body has called for an end to the harassment. On Wednesday, an ESA spokesperson said "threats of violence and harassment are wrong. They have to stop." In a statement to The Washington Post, the ESA Added: "There is no place in the video game community--or our society--for personal attacks and threats.â€ The ESA represents some of the games industry's biggest publishers, and lobbies for their causes in Washington. ESA members include Activision, Electronic Arts, Microsoft, Sony, Ubisoft and Nintendo of America. The statement coincides with a separate campaign on Twitter to bring an end to the GamerGate row. On Wednesday, more than 90,000 tweets were generated on Twitter with the hashtag #StopGamerGate2014 Add Rep and Leave a feedback Reputation is the green button in the down right corner on my post