Invite Scene - #1 to Buy, Sell, Trade or Find Free Torrent Invites!
#1 TorrentInvites Community. Buy, Sell, Trade Or Find Free Torrent Invites, For Every Private Torrent Trackers. HDBITS, PTP, BTN, MTV, EMP, EXIGO, RED, OPS, TT, BIB, TTG, MTEAM, CHDBITS, CG, TIK, KG, FSC, BB, IPT, TL, GGN, AB, U2 etc.
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'infringers'.
Found 2 results
The company has filed a lawsuit at a federal court accusing unknown AT&T subscriber(s) of activating pirated copies of its operating system and other software products. The AT&T account was tracked by the tech giantâ€™s own cyberforensics team due to â€œsuspicious activation patternsâ€. Although Microsoft is known worldwide as one of the most pirated software vendors, the company doesnâ€™t have a long track record of dealing with individual infringers. Actually, a couple months ago, the company even noted that piracy could sometimes even act as a conversion tool. Apparently, this didnâ€™t mean that all pirates could have their way. The tech giantâ€™s cybercrime center seems to be keeping a close eye on the unauthorized use of Microsoftâ€™s software products. A few days ago, the company has filed a copyright infringement complaint against an individual (or a group) who activated pirated copies of Windows 7 and Office 10 from an IP address assigned to the AT&T subscription account. You may think that pirated copies are hard for the company to detect, but Microsoft explained that it uses modern technology to track software piracy. The software developer described its investigative approach as cyberforensics: its team looks for activation patterns and characteristics that make it likely that certain IP-addresses are engaged in illegal copying. For example, the company analyzes product key activation data received from users when they activate the software. This data includes the IP address from which the key has been activated. By the way, such reports are sent by users voluntarily. The lawsuit claims that the defendants have activated numerous copies of Microsoft software products, including Windows 7 and Office 2010, with suspicious registration keys. The company believes that those were stolen from its supply chain, then used without permission from the refurbisher channel, and more often than the Microsoft license permitted. Now the company wants the court to allow it to identify the individual or a group of them responsible for the copyright violations in order to compensate the damage it has suffered. According to Microsoftâ€™s complaint, it looks like the defendant is not an average user, but perhaps a person selling PCs with pirated software. Well, letâ€™s see what the court has to tell the company.
Github says it has made significant changes to the way it handles DMCA takedown notices. In an effort to boost transparency, the collaborative code repository says that whenever possible alleged infringers will get a chance to put things right before their content is taken down. Like other highly-trafficked domains relying heavily on user contributed content, coding and collaboration platform Github now publishes its own transparency report detailing copyright-related complaints received by the company. Some of these DMCA notices have been reported here on TF in recent months, including one sent by the MPAA which effectively ended Popcorn Timeâ€™s presence on the site and another sent by Microsoft targeting an Xbox music app. Now, in a move to bring more transparency and clarity to its copyright processes, Github has announced significant changes to the way it handles DMCA complaints. The company says that three major changes have been implemented in order to improve on-site experience and better serve users. In the first instance, copyright owners will need to conduct their investigations as usual and send a properly formatted takedown notice to Github. Presuming it meets statutory requirements, Github will publish it in their transparency report and pass a link to the user in question. At this point Githubâ€™s new policy begins to take effect. Previously the company wouldâ€™ve immediately taken down the complained-about content but Github now says it wants to provide alleged infringers with a chance to put things right â€œwhenever possible.â€ 24 hours to take action To this end, Github says users will have the opportunity to modify or remove content within 24 hours of a complaint. Copyright holders will be notified that Github has given the affected user this leeway and it will be down to the user to inform Github within the allotted period that the appropriate changes have been made. Failure to do so will see the repository removed. Despite this wiggle room, not all complaints will result in the luxury of a 24 hour â€˜actionâ€™ period. Should a DMCA notice claim that the entire contents of a repository infringe, the repository in question will be removed â€œexpeditiously.â€ Forks will not be automatically disabled The second significant change is that when Github receives a copyright complaint against a parent repository, it will not automatically disable project forks. For that to happen any complaint will have to specifically include not only the parentâ€™s URL, but also the locations of all related forks. â€œGitHub will not automatically disable forks when disabling a parent repository. This is because forks belong to different users, may have been altered in significant ways, and may be licensed or used in a different way that is protected by the fair-use doctrine,â€ Github explains. Fighting back: Counter-notices As required by law, users affected by takedown notices have a right of reply if they believe theyâ€™ve been wrongly targeted. Sufficiently detailed counter notices can be submitted to Github for forwarding to complaining rightsholders. They will also be published in the siteâ€™s transparency report. This right of reply is very important and one that appears to be under utilized. Earlier this month Github published a complaint which targeted and took down a wide range of addons for the popular media player XBMC. Apparently sent by â€˜DMCA Secureâ€™, a company that has no immediately visible web presence, the notice claimed to represent a wide range of copyright holders including Sony, Fox, Dreamworks, NFL and WWE, to name just a few. The notice is unusual. While itâ€™s common for the first three companies to team up, weâ€™d never seen a notice featuring such a wide range of diverse rightsholders before. Also, while the functionality of the code could give rise to copyright issues, none of those companies own the copyrights to the code in question. TF put it to Github that the complaint looked unusual and might even be bogus, but the company declined to comment on specific cases. Like many companies in similar positions, it appears Github has to take notices on face value and relies on users to submit counter-notices to air their complaints. None of the repositories in question have done so. Githubâ€™s revamped DMCA policy can be found here, along with how-to guides on submitting takedown and counter notices. While Github is well-known in the technology sector, it may come as a surprise just how popular the service is. Around seven million people use the site and according to Alexa, Github.com is the 127th most-visited domain in the world. Add Rep and Leave a feedback Reputation is the green button in the down right corner on my post